In this video, Reynouard reported on the censorship that strikes him (it's the turn of the SNCB (Belgian equivalent of SNCF) that threaten to bring charges against his video on the regimentation of youth), announces the availability the new issue of its review and appeals to acquire a fundamental intellectual weapon in the revisionist struggle.
Who knows the date of April, 4th (1943)? That day, Paris and its suburbs suffered severe bombing that hit innocent civilians and caused more civilian casualties than the events of November, 13 2015. In this editorial, Vincent Reynouard says, based on documentation, these terrible hours: death is striking, the hard work of the rescuers trying to save from death the buried, the heroic exploits of some, the ordeal of identifying the victims ... "it was the war" was the common answer as an excuse for that tkind of ordeal. If it was true, then today, one would remember, on behalf of Memory, as a necessary evil. But the opposite happens: the amnesia is cultivated. Based on the speeches made at the time by the religious authorities, Vincent Reynouard explains why ...
Why are some Jewish associations bent on tracking down old Germans who worked in the camps? The reason: the official "Holocaust" history is bankrupt. Demo in this video ...
Un débat public pour le professeur Faurisson. Abrogation de la loi Gayssot. In this video, I draw up a chronology of the main events which, since 1945, forged the revisionist epic. From the judgment of the Nuremberg Tribunal (October 1946) to the QPC supported by my lawyer Mr. Wilfried Paris (December 2015) through the heroic struggle of Professor Faurisson. This to demonstrate that a public debate on the "gas chambers" issue is completely legitimate. So let's repeal the anti-revisionist laws, and demand this debate that Professor Faurisson is proposing since 1987.
Un débat public pour le professeur Faurisson. Abrogation de la loi Gayssot.
In this video, I draw up a chronology of the main events which, since 1945, forged the revisionist epic. The judgment of the Nuremberg Tribunal (October 1946) to the QPC supported by my lawyer Mr. Wilfried Paris (December 2015) through the heroic struggle of Professor Faurisson. This to demonstrate that a public debate on the issue of "gas chambers" is completely legitimate. So let's repeal the anti-revisionist laws, and demand this debate that Professor Faurisson proposes since 1987.
In this video, I firstly analyze the decision of the Constitutional Council, which rejected the QPC against the Gayssot Act. I show that by a clever reversal of perspective, the Council of Sages eluded the main argument presented by the lawyer Mr. Paris: the inequality (victims) before the law. I would add that the Sages then resumed the worthless argument of Robert Badinter who falsely invokes "the authority of res judicata" (Nuremberg). Then they came with the eternal Joker that can justify all the prohibitions: anti-Semitism. I reject this argument which consists in invoking the alleged anti-Semitism of the revisionists, so the supposed necessity of silencing them.
Dans cet entretien avec Vincent Reynouard, Siegfried Verbeke, qui a étudié l’intégralité des rapports généraux d’actions des Einsatzgruppen, dévoile le nombre de victimes auquel on arrive en comptabilisant toutes les tueries (un nombre qu’il faut réviser à la baisse, jusqu’à un facteur 10, souligne Reynouard, documents à l’appui).
Il explique pourquoi, après avoir lu ces rapports, sa conviction est faite: la « Shoah par balles » est un mythe de plus…
Dans cette vidéo, Vincent Reynouard explique que si la réalité des tueries de Juifs à l’Est est indéniable (bien que les estimations des morts soient trop élevées, on y reviendra dans la quatrième partie), ces tueries ne s’inscrivaient pas dans un plan d’extermination systématique des Juifs.
Dans cette deuxième partie, Vincent Reynouard explique pourquoi, le 21 juin 1941, Hitler a lancé ses troupes à l’assaut du géant soviétique.
Puis il démontre que dès les premiers jours du conflit, les Soviétiques se rendirent coupables d’atroces violations du Droit de la guerre, initiant ainsi la spirale de la violence qui allait faire de cette lutte une horrible guerre d’extermination idéologique. Quel allait être le sort des Juifs?
Les Einsatzgruppen sont ces unités mobiles qui, en URSS, auraient systématiquement massacré plus d’un million de juifs dans ce qu’on appelle aujourd’hui « la Shoah par balles ».
Dans cette première vidéo sur le sujet, Vincent Reynouard explique tout d’abord le contexte de l’affaire.
On October 15, 2015 the European Court of Human Rights have "vindicated" Dogu Perinçek the Turkish "negationist" of the Armenian genocide. Some saw in that judgment the possibility that this court authorizes, logically, the contesting of the "Holocaust".
Close to Nicolas Sarkozy and Vice Chairwoman of the France-Armenia friendship group, Valerie Boyer has submitted a draft for a widespread Gayssot law that would prohibit the "negation" of all genocides and crimes against humanity of the 20th century (recognized by the French State).
Map of the video:
Part 1: National-Socialism and totalitarianism
- The circumstantial reasons of Hitler's authoritarianism
- The real role of the Gestapo
Part 2: Rehabilitate racism
- Black Racism
- Racism: a dangerous topic
- What is racism when well understood
- A racist refuting a usual racist argument
- Racism of Hitler: an unequal polygenism
- The dishonesty of the prosecution at Nuremberg
- The forger Hermann Rauschning
- Racism in the Third Reich
- And the "Race of the Lords"?
Part 3: A hypocritical concept of "freedom"
- An example: Baroin in the Morano case
- No freedom for those who break a taboo
- Misunderstanding about "freedom"
- Hope: my Priority Question of Constitutionality
Reacting to what Nadine Morano said, Chantale Jouanno, an allied of Nicolas Sarkozy, said that the Harkis were "more French than many French", because they have defended "all the values of France". I analyze her words and I link them to the slogans saw in the anti-Le Pen demonstrations of April-May 2002. It is undeniable, far from being egalitarian, the Republic links citizenship to the ideological adherence to its "values". I draw from it the consequences personally and politically showing that the democratic struggle is vain, since the Republicans have locked everything. Only a crisis could change things. And if, tomorrow, a non Republican regime is established, he will be able to rely on Chantale Jouanno's words, to dismiss all Republicans of French nationality...
Nadine Morano invokes C. de Gaulle to defend a traditional and true France. In this video, I demonstrate that her position is illogical: in recent History, it was Hitler, in fact, who defended this France. And it's the Nuremberg judgment, which today, prevents any real defense of the true nations. Nadine Morano must, therefore, revise her positions and begin to address the Nuremberg's trials.
Does the National Socialiste struggle, today, still make sense? In this first part, I rely on a statement of Hermann Göring, at the Nurembeeg trials, to answer in the affirmative. Then, in order to parry the first objection, I explain why the concentration camps in Germany were only an accident of history.
In this ultimate video synthesis (which targets the general public), I present briefly the main revisionist's arguments, to show that it is not anti-Semitism, but exclusively history. Then, I ask the question: why this debat denial and why this judicial harassment against the revisionists?
In 2008, the world press spoke of the "original plans of Auschwitz" discovered in Berlin and one of which showed a "gas chamber". In this video I explain that it was a simple delousing gas chamber and I want to point out that in this room, where Zyklon B was used extensively, the walls are stained with blue spots. But, in the alleged "gas chambers" homicide, there is no blue spot. This is a simple and clear proof that in these premises, one never committed a mass murder with Zyklon B. Then, I answer to the objections developped in the opposite camp against this argument.