Adam Antium Moloney - Weapons of Mass Discussion | Z-Day 2014
0 (0 Likes / 0 Dislikes)
hello I hope you're all doing well my name is
adamantium and welcome to weapons of mass destruction
the intellectual artillery at the TCM activist
I apologize for the seemingly over intellectual eyes title
since I was gonna use too much simpler logic bombs
however a test say such a tight would be flagged up
instantly by GCHQ so this is my feeble attempt at
sidestepping the domestic terrorist watch list even though I probably
of logic bombs used to quickly and easily communicate
either rebuttals against arguments made against
the sustainable train of thought all to detail differing
elements of it in addition to explaining why
each angle is used as usual
I'll give you my disclaimer which is please don't believe
or feel instructed to obey a single word I say
instead Inc use one saying its inspiration to do your own research
and us arrive and you're in conclusion so why use logic bombs
festival and more often these days
you will notice that as a communicator you'll be dealing with critics who
either don't have the time
all the inclination to speak at length about these issues
so I found just dropping the a relevant logic bomb when needed
saves time energy and strained communications
but are in fact seats a thought and planting that seed
in those ideas growing naturally in their own minds
third we need to consider the fact that in this culture we're not encouraged
to have lengthy profound discussions but rather fleeting and superficial chatter
where things are explained away using cliches
in precept races have apologetics such as
it's human nature all it will never happen
among others after all lengthy conversations require more knowledge
a certain topics or at least in openness
too many areas have knowledge this is detrimental to the perpetuation of
because knowledge leads a person to be less controllable
so with that said attempting our communications
may need proof more successful as an introduction to the kind that logic
bombs I'll be presenting
here's an effective means of not only delaying that seed
have learned social convention and that is the inevitable question that comes up
when meeting someone in a social setting
what do you do now experience tells us that what they mean
is what do you do for a living however when you
whitened the potential scope have such a question you find you can apply
another angle so the way I would phrase in
I didn't mean what do you do for money I mean what do you do for Humanity
the next one is what I call the job prison
the obvious parallels between employment
and incarceration system aside this is an issue that comes up
in the rhetoric of the establishment and even the
anti-cuts movement in unions his claim is that we need to create more jobs
specifically for the native Christians have those inclined towards nationalism
to solve the unemployment problem omitting the fact that job so far
disappearing and not coming back due to technological replacement if human labor
systematic shutting down of industries due to monetary constraints
and the outsourcing of those jobs to lower-paid workers in foreign countries
by creating more positions have paid slavery
you're in a systematically closing prison and when your test and
do you realize you're free or demand to be locked back up
any reason why this is a bad news scenario in the current system is that
in slavery and provides the money which is then used to purchase resources
but considering the fact that of the great living as an affordable and viable
happen you for transition
to sustainable living it's not such a bad thing
next topic is so-called economic growth
an issue that we hear about from politicians economists and bankers when
asked how
and at the same time the clint to define growth
if they will honest about what growth is they would have to a concert that it is
to measure
a pic celebration have currency circulation
more transactions more money some material is changing hands
people buying things in spending more which on the face a bit
sounds good however cannot sustain
I'm place to write earth is abundant
but it's not infinite plus a paradigm
based upon the requirement eat through all the planet's resources
I would address the issue with the following logic bomb
infinite growth on a planet a finite resources
there's only one thing that behaves in that exact manner we call it cancer
so next topic how do we deal with the snacks and difficulties
I feel inclined to remind people that the transition is not something which
can be assigned with a concrete plan of action that will be followed through to
the letter
because everything is always changing and when not
fortune tellers so we need to adapt
and adopt a different approach this is something of also covered in my
transitional doing presentation lasts a day
essentially the scenario the he is still trying to work your way through
a huge many slash obstacle course
the size of a football field it's pitch black C you can see anything you can
hear voices kiting more perhaps miss kiting you
and to top it off the mazes always reconfiguring
that is the reality for the future so
I addressed this issue in the following manner:
in a maze that is always changing you cannot rely
on a concrete preset route the best way to succeed
is to adapt along with it
sustainability comes up
is the it will never happen mantra
what saddens me is that a good portion
of this rhetoric comes from parents but I'll touch on that later
after years in countering this I realized something telling
the reason people either say it will never happen
or it won't happen in my lifetime is because
these people happy that completely rejected the idea of
anything in proving or they project
help the point of improvement beyond their likely life span
so they don't have to personally deal with the necessary changes
and upon for the pressing these people generally
do concede that a dismissive attitude toward social change
is not the best means to achieve social change
which is why I answer this with the following phrase
in fact it's the best way to ensure it'll never happen
because cynicism isn't progress
next up is the topic has overpopulation many people in this society try to infer
that the problem
cursory calculation of people to the livable area: said the planet
so if that's not the problem them participate in this regard
could it possibly be anything to do with the fact that the current model
is nowhere near efficient all accommodating
just a thought in reality we could feed
everyone if we were to use hydroponic that's cool agriculture
on just 0.06 percent
of the land currently he used to grow food so to address this issue
I would use the following logic bomb considering we can all fit in Texas
the problem is in too many people it's the grossly
inefficient means we use to create life needs
next topic his profit versus solutions
and if anyone doesn't recognize on the man on the left
the man on the left is as you well know nikola Tesla
who we all have to thank for the radio DC power
wireless technology among host a father innovations
and respected scientist he had the principles
and practice %uh weil es free energy back
in the early nineteen hundred's
the problem is there's no money in free abundant energy
so his funding was withdrawn by JP Morgan when he found out about the
warden
left out project which is pictured on the right
and because money is a factor in the equation how well sorry Tessler
there's no profit in providing for the globe enjoy financial destitution
edison the guy who was electrocuted in elephant by the name of talk see
just a smear Tesla's DC technology
got the financial backing that should have gone to Tesla
so with that in mind I addressed the issue with the following response
Nikola Tesla's ideas for free energy for the planet
Wilson implemented because he isn't profitable
thats profit is inverse to progress
someone to the next issue malevolent technology
when it comes to loot the advancing the pollution of technology and how it's
portrayed in the media and by culture in certain respects
is the idea that it will act in and emotionless and us malevolent manner
and if you think that is actually true ask yourself
if the character Spock is a good guy on
I guess part of what adds to this fear is to rate the technology evolves
which is by the way exponentially
ephemeral isolation a tank want by Bucky fuller
with increasingly less sizeof tech
this naturally leads ask clunky brain talking monkeys
in its wake and that can be disconcerting
this fear has been fed even though
and malevolence at the terminators is purely
an execution of human programming to kill humans
and Vicky the machine intelligence in I Roble
being willing to wipe out humanity to save it from itself
was really nothing more than the human nature fallacy
so how I with some this amp is machines have no malice
the simulations of it a machine would only home for two reasons
malfunction or execution a few min programming
this next issue was actually brought up to me by a troll on the cheap
essentially he claimed that natural resource-based economy
has the same and goals as Marxism
fuss they are both the same the fact of the matter is that Marxism
dozen have the exact same and goals
an argument could be made that any economic system
does in the least pretend that eventually
if its principles are followed correctly that it will result in a happy healthy
and free society
in order for it to gain any real traction when proposed
it would have to but it's the Ensco often cannot justify the means
and the same in the end goal it's the same the difference
i would emphasize on is that Marxism hopes to achieve cohesion crew
coalition and NLRB
works towards creating cohesion through
cooperation very different
it is the hughes or absence of Use a force
or coercion which differentiates the two
and I sum this up in a rather crude but simple analogy
the end goal of a guy on the pole and a rapist
is the same to have sex the difference
is with the force and coercion is used to succeed
next up is root cause analysis
one of the best tools for problem solving so much so
that this happen cations can extend deep into the resolution
both as far as I can tell all about problems
there's three examples that I generally like to use to demonstrate the power of
and that's weeks in your garden rats in your kitchen
an inoperable brain chamber in Moscow
the beautiful thing about seeking group courses is that it enables you to truly
get
what sets the wheels %uh any problem in motion
and eradicating that root cause your advocate the problem
by means have true prevention
so how address this by just picking one of the six samples
his if you had an operable brain Chama
would you want it removed engaging therapy
or just be fat painkillers and hope it goes away
next the topic %uh our current punishment paradigm
upon which I can make an hour-long presentation just by itself
but to touch base on it here one thing that seems to go completely unnoticed
all just ignored is the fact that punishment cannot be used
to treat violence because punishment is a
forum a finance and a current methods
to get what you want is OK
imprisoning which actually racist the stock prices have privately and prisons
or executing because it seems people are
these and the other punitive measures we used do nothing
to eradicate the problem because ironically
they show every sin have creating and magnifying
violent behaviors the best place to go to learn how to be final in
gays prison so I address this issue with the following response
there is no evidence to support the claim the punishment works
because it lacks preventive power
punishment is synonymous with revenge
next up is the all too often repeated but seldom understood me even less
substantiated claim that we need to work for a living
this is essentially a phrase to propagandize
a population into embracing and requiring
is posed as the only viable way
have doing things and because we enjoy a slightly less
over condition have enslaved men compared to other countries
we fall into the Aleutian slavery is could
and its home K to need it and I completely
disagree we have the technology to provide for
everyone's life needs and to free them from life
need to work for a living be anything more
then unjust paid slavery
so I addressed this issue with following statement
we do you don't need to work for a living nor do we need the money
that that's late repays us it is access to what that money
would need to have so much money it can be doped
a for cheating and yes that is a diamond-encrusted mercedes-benz
that cost $48 million dollars to make
and people will be in charge one thousand dollars just to touch it
this is a perfect illustration of the ridiculous links
that one has to go to to justify
having more money then you can know what to do with
and when we step back and just look objectively
about the idea of accruing money it was to ensure that the you could meet your
needs with comfort nowadays
seeking money for the sake of seeking money has become the objective
rather than using money to create systems to provide for all humanity
and us ending with the need for it
but for this issue I choose a comical response which is
the only circumstance where I would look the other way and fax support the idea
of you being rich
that is if you were stands law brzezinski
moving on to the penultimate issue in this presentation we have
the allegiance two values this attachment we have to contemporary
or even antiquated rhetoric or belief systems
and in fact for most people it's the last remaining battlefield
that people fight change the comfort and sticking with the Familia
bolstering your positions and justifying your thanks by making claims
to send values have helped that day
what all these defensive have in common his to protect the established few
against new and improving ideas
for example the blind patriotism is illustrated on the left
here where children on a daily basis put their hand on heart
from questioning governmental behaviour because you already sworn
to obey and trust the government cognitive dissonance
information age
clashes with the stacked in values and this can understandably
cause people to lose direction so I address this issue with the following
phrase
since everything changes we owe going
because what is taught isn't necessarily
what is true so to close this presentation now
the final issue the point caring
this to me is one of the most central points that we as a species need to
and if you take anything away from this talk
this should be a the image you're looking at
is actually at genuine English propaganda poster from 1915 the I myself
modified the original had a quote from the daughter saying
and as you can see updated it to a possible future scenario
when we look back on a collapsed anti economy
and we encounter the thought that it could have been avoided
if only we cared enough when we break this concept down
we realize that since we hear we have an opportunity
and some would even say an obligation to do what we can
to insure at least a little improvement
for all humankind so when I come to generations look at our house
and we realize that they will most likely be alive
after we die and as such they're having to pick up from where we left off
why would we deliberately or even apathetic Lee
do them the disservice of making them pay
this apathetic attitude I see displayed by these people
who don't really care about what happens in the future
as long as they aren't personally inconvenienced is displayed
by a hell of a lot of parents and in some of the most belligerent cases
of outputs have three children they gave birth to all these kits
and yet they could not care about the kind of welfare
have knowingly brought their kids into sometimes this is a case of blind faith
in the wishy-washy rhetoric have politicians who've made promises
life
as long as we work hard enough for her
so if you think about it if you you our parent
then you have more responsibility then even me
to do what you can to make the world a better place
because you have brought a child into this world
don't you care about what kind of world you've just forced them to inherit
and when we think about that week and then think about
what if my child has a child if they return
when applying this train a full dust make us wonder how many generations
or how many years into the future out we prepared to care
at what point do we come of our compassion
and for the parents who claimed that a better world will never happen
or at least not in their lifetime them why
did you can see show children to begin with so
I provide the final logic bomb for this talk
if we claim to care about archaeon it isn't duty
to do what we can to ensure the world we forced our young
to inherit is a good one
so if you wish to find out more information please
this it the Zeitgeist Movement dot com which now features for free download
a comprehensive text called the Zeitgeist Movement defined
which details exactly what TZM advocates
additionally the Phoenix project ok on is up call on your
copia of wonderful concepts and designs
to make this place better for all I thank you for taking the time to watch
this video
and take care