Watch videos with subtitles in your language, upload your videos, create your own subtitles! Click here to learn more on "how to Dotsub"

Ron Paul on

0 (0 Likes / 0 Dislikes)
JON STEWART: Welcome back, everyone. My guest is an 11-term Republican Congressman from the state of Texas who ran for President in 2008. His new book is called “End The Fed”. Please welcome back to the program Congressman Ron Paul! (cheers and applause) STEWART: Nice to see you again, sir. RON PAUL: Good to see you. Thank you. STEWART: I’ve read many – this is called “End the Fed” I have read many politician’s books. They typically are a couple of apocryphal campaign anecdotes, cut and paste from one of Churchill’s books. A little end with the American exceptionalism, God and faith. You seem to have a put a lot of thought and effort into this book. (LAUGHTER) And you call yourself a Congressman. (CHEERS AND APPLAUSE) It’s a very -- It's interesting. You've been calling -- railing against this type of government intervention, the Federal Reserve, for the last 30 to 35 years. Suddenly, the tea parties arise, calling for a very similar type of thing. Do you feel like you were in a cool indie band and someone came in and like kind of stole your sound and, by golly, he's super big? How do you feel watching that develop over the last eight or nine months? PAUL: It scares the living daylights out of me. STEWART: (Laughter). There goes the daylight. PAUL: Well now, what has happened is that the concerns of how it come about, it’s not because I knew about this. I think good economic policy will tell us that these problems are here and everybody knows we’re in the middle of a big problem. We’ve have… Jon Stewart: But you are this way with Republican administrations, with Democratic administrations. It is a consistency not often seen. PAUL: Right, my biggest concern is personal liberty and I’ve noticed over the years that both Republicans and Democrats have very little respect for personal liberties. and therefore I’ve been fighting this and I want the government to be small. If the government is big, you have less personal liberty and you have to find out how they finance big government and they tax us a lot, but it’s not enough to pay the bills. They borrow a lot and that’s not enough and then there’s another method and it has to do with the Fed. They have this little thing called the counterfeit machine and they just print the money when they need it. You know, you and I, we’d go to jail if we did that, but the Fed does it in secrecy and they get away with it and the government keeps growing and you have runaway welfare spending and then on top of that, they use this to finance these wars that I think are so ridiculous. You know, undeclared wars, endless wars, good wars, long wars, and all kinds of wars with no end in sight. So I’ve put a lot of blame on the Fed because they monetize these debts. We would be taken to jail if we print the money. STEWART: And do they ever, you know, first of all, I was struck by what you said me going to jail for printing money. AUDIENCE: (LAUGHTER) STEWART: We have to make a quick call after the show. AUDIENCE: (LAUGHTER) STEWART: But it is interesting. You know, reading about the history of the Fed that you lay out. Their policy is always talking about controlling inflation or preventing deflation, but it is always inflationary. It always seems that over years, they just print more money and you believe that it then creates an illusion of an economy rather than an economy. PAUL: Temporarily, it helps. You know, if you borrow a lot of money. If an individual borrows a million dollars a month, they can live beyond their means until they have to pay the bills. What the government does, if they pay their bills through financial crisis, inflation, unemployment and all these kinds of problems (emerge), but one of their jobs was to have a sound dollar and steady prices. Well, in 1913, when they started, they have a dollar stock, but it’s worth 4 cents right now. Most of us have for employment, true statistics now in the free market, where we calculate our unemployment per five persons, (at) 20 percent, so they haven’t given us sound money. They don’t give us steady prices. They say, “Well, we want to steady the interest rates.” Well, the interest rates are, in my lifetime, they’ve been 21 percent and they’ve been less than 1 percent, so they have failed in everything they’ve done. They have given us big government and they have helped in a significant way to undermine our liberty. STEWART: What do you say if somebody says, “But what is the answer in the absence of any regulation or in the absence of any controlling entity?" Isn’t it anarchy? Isn’t there chaos? Before the Fed, the 1800s, would anyone choose that century as a model for stability, you know, economically? PAUL: It would help guide us because we had significant growth for 30 or 40 years at the end of 19th century and we had a gradually decreasing price Actually, your purchasing power went up, but it was not perfect because we have they call benevolism. They fixed the price ratio between gold and silver and there were shortcomings and frequently State’s abuse, so it was imperfect, but the Founders knew about inflation. The destruction … STEWART: Well, you’re more Jeffersonian on this. You would say he fought against the Central Bank and you would say that he would make the right call. But who would fill that gap? You know, is government the only infringement on personal liberty? You know, because it seems like government also can provide a bore against tyranny, the civil rights movement in such. Are there other things that infringe personal liberty in government? PAUL: Oh, yes, all the time. Well, with money, the government should protect the value of the money and not destroy it. But yes, the government has an important role in financial issues. They should protect against fraud. For instance, Enron went bankrupt. The market said their stock was worthless and under State Anti-Fraud laws, these individuals were prosecuted and put in jail. You didn’t need more regulations. You have to have anti-fraud laws. But it’s hard to enforce fraud laws when the government participates in fraud. STEWART: (LAUGHTER) AUDIENCE: (LAUGHTER) STEWART: I’d really like this cast already. Extraordinary. PAUL: Yeah, it’s hard to prosecute… STEWART: It’s hard to support fraud when the government is committing fraud. PAUL: Well, what about Madoff. He deserves to go to jail, but you know, well, there’s a Ponzi scheme done in DC it’s a same situation down there. STEWART: Is that a failure though of a lack of oversight? I guess what I’m trying to wrap my head around is even a libertarian viewpoint would say that we need government to provide for the common defense. PAUL: Yes, sure. STEWART: Who protects us from corporatism? Who protects us from… is it the corporate attack, maybe not as bloody as another country coming in, but isn’t it as necessary for the little guy to be protected from that by some kind of collective? PAUL: Yes. STEWART: And some others. PAUL: Yes. But to do this, it’s more about prevention than by regulating it. You caused all these harm and trouble and inflation. STEWART: Right. PAUL: What you want to do is prevent it. The corporations have no right to come to government and get special benefits. The Halliburtons wouldn’t exist in a libertarian society. STEWART: Right. PAUL: And they get special benefits. It started early on, even with the railroads. I mean, they’ve got certain benefits. So corporations that makes money because you and I and everybody else buy their product. Business, good and bad and corporate profit reflects that they have given the consumer a good product at a good price, but if they’re big because they’re wheeling and dealing with the government. The bigger the government is, the more it encourages the lobbyists because then the incentive to go down there and control the government to get the benefits. STEWART: Has anyone try to, you know, in what you would call your ideal, has that been tried? Is there a country, is there a government that you believe approximated your ideal of a more sort of a liberty-oriented and economically and socially government? PAUL: Well, we haven’t reached the ideal and we’re not likely to, but I think our country started off pretty well. You know, fairly well. They had the intention. They recognized property rights, sound money, and contracts and you didn’t have the right to destroy your neighbor’s property and so I think… STEWART: Oh, all right. I’ve got to make another call then. All right. AUDIENCE: (LAUGHTER) PAUL: I don’t want to get you in any trouble. STEWART: Exactly. Thank you for writing this book. It is really thought-provoking and just really well written and clearly from the heart and it clearly comes from a foundation of belief that you know an awfully a lot about and how you’ve survived in government for eleven terms, I do not know, but thanks for being here. End the Fed is on the bookshelves now. You really should check it out. Thank you, sir. PAUL: Thanks a lot. I appreciate you having me here. STEWART: Thank you, sir. AUDIENCE: (CHEERS AND APPLAUSE)

Video Details

Duration: 9 minutes and 3 seconds
Country: United States
Language: English
Producer: KramerDSP
Director: KramerDSP
Views: 161
Posted by: kramerdsp on Sep 30, 2009

Ron Paul is interviewed by Jon Stewart on The Daily Show and talks about his new book, "End The Fed". (FAIR USE CLAUSE)

Caption and Translate

    Sign In/Register for Dotsub to translate this video.