Sebastian Seung: I am my connectome
0 (0 Likes / 0 Dislikes)
We live in a remarkable time.
The age of genomics.
Your genome is the entire sequence of your DNA.
Your sequence and mine are slightly different.
That's why we look different.
I've got brown eyes,
you might have blue,
or gray.
But it's not just skin deep.
The headlights tell us that genes can give us
scary diseases,
maybe even shape
our personality, or give us mental disorders.
Our genes seem to have
awesome power over our destinies.
And yet...
I would like to think that
I am more than my genes.
What do you guys think?
Are you more than your genes?
Yes?
I think some people agr- I think some people agree with me
I think we should make a statement. I think we should say it all together.
Alright? I am more than my genes.
All together.
I am more than my genes!
What am I?
I am my
connectome.
And since you guys are really great,
maybe you can humor me and say this all together too?
Right? All together now.
I am my connectome.
Oof, that sounded great.
You know, you guys are so great.
You don't even know what a connectome is, and you're willing to play along with me.
I can just go home now.
Well, so far, only one connectome is known.
that of this tiny worm.
It's modest nervous system consists of just 300 neurons.
And in the 1970's and 80's
a team of scientists mapped
all 7000 connections between the neurons.
In this diagram, every node is a neuron
and every line is a connection.
This is the connectome of the worm C.elegans.
Your connectome is far more complex than this.
because your brain contains
100 billion neurons and 10.000 times as many connections.
There's a diagram like this for your brain, but there's no way it would fit on this slide.
Your connectome contains
one million times more connections
than your genome has letters.
That's a lot of information.
What's in that information?
We don't know for sure but there are theories.
Since the 19th century, neuroscientists have speculated
That maybe your memories, the information that makes you, you....
maybe your memories are stored in the connections between your brains neurons.
And perhaps other aspects of your personal identity, maybe your
personality and your intelect
maybe they're also encoded
in the connections between your neurons.
And so, now, you can see why
I proposed this hypothesis on "I am my connectome."
I didn't ask you to chant it because it's true.
I just want you to remember it.
And in fact, we don't know if this hypothesis is correct,
because we have never had technologies powerful enough
to test it.
Finding that worm connectome took over a dozen years of tedious labor.
And to find the connectome to brains more like our own
We need more sofisticated technologies, that are automated,
that will speed up the process of finding connectomes.
And in the next few minutes, I'll tell you about some of these technologies
which are currently under development
in my lab and the labs of my collaborators.
Now you've probably seen
pictures of neurons before, you can recognize them instantly
by their fantastic shapes.
They extend long and delicate branches
and in short, they look like trees.
But this is just a single neuron.
In order to find a connectome, we have to see all the neurons
at the same time.
So let's meet Bobby Kasthury
who works in the laboratory of Jeff Lickman
at Harvard university.
Bobby is holding fantastically thin slices
of a mouse brain.
and we're zooming in by a factor of 1.000 times.
To obtain the resolution,
So that we can see the branches of neurons all at the same time.
Except, you still may not really recognize them
and that's because we have to work in 3 dimensions.
if we take many images
of many slices of the brain
and stack them up, we get a 3 dimensional image.
and still you may not see the branches.
So we start at the top, and we color in the cross section
of one branch in red.
And we do that for the next slice.
And for the next slice.
and we keep on doing that, slice after slice.
If we continue through the entire stack,
We can reconstruct the 3 dimensional shape
of a small fragment of a branch of a neuron.
and we can do that for another neuron in green.
And you can see that the green neuron touches the red neuron in 2 locations.
And these are what are called "Synapses" .
Let's zoom in on one synapse and keep your eyes on the interior of the green neuron.
You should see small circles.
These are called "vesicles"
They contain a molecule known as a neurotransmitter.
And so when the green neuron wants to communicate, wants to send a message to the red neuron
it spits out neurotransmitter.
At the synapse, the two neurons are said to be connected.
Like two friends talking on the telephone.
So you've seen how to find a synapse. How can we find an entire connectome?
Well we take this 3 dimensional stack of images
and treat it as a gigantic 3 dimensional coloring book.
We color every neuron in in a different color
and then we look through all the images, find the synapses,
and note the colors of the 2 neurons involved in each synapse.
If we can do that throughout all the images,
we could find a connectome.
Now at this point, you've learned the basics of neurons
and synapses, and I think we're ready to tackle
one of the most important questions in neuroscience.
How are the brains of men and women different?
according to this self help book,
guys brains are like waffles.
They keep their lives compartmentalized in boxes.
Girl's brains are like spaghetti.
Everything in their life is connected to everything else.
You guys are laughing, but you know, this book changed my life!
But seriously, what's wrong with this?
You already know enough to tell me, what's wrong with this statement?
It doesn't matter whether you're a guy or a girl,
everyone's brains are like spaghetti.
Or maybe really really fine capellini with Branches.
Just as one strand of spaghetti contacts many other strands on your plate
one neuron touches many other neurons through their entangled branches.
One neuron can be connected to so many other neurons
because there can be synapses at these points of contact.
By now you might have
sort of lost perspective on how large this cube of brain tissue actually is.
And so let's do a series of comparisons to show you.
I assure you this is very tiny, it's just 6 microns on a side.
So here's how it stacks up against an entire neuron.
And you can tell that really,
only the smallest fragments of branches are contained inside this cube.
And a neuron, well, that smaller than brain,
and that's just a mouse brain.
It's a lot smaller than a human brain.
So when I show my friends this, sometimes they told me,
You know Sebastian, you should just give up.
Neuroscience is hopeless.
Because if you look at a brain with the naked eye,
you don't really see how complex it is
but when you use a microscope,
finally the hidden complexity
is revealed.
In the 17th century the mathematician and philosopher, Blaise Pascal,
wrote of his dread of the infinite.
His feeling of insignificance
and contemplating the fast reaches of outer space.
And as a scientist, I'm not supposed to talk about my feelings,
too much information, professor.
But may I?
I feel curiosity.
And I feel wonder.
But at times, I have also felt dispair.
Why did I choose to study this organ that is so awesome in it's complexity,
that it might well be infinite?
It's absurd!
How can we even dare to think,
that we might ever understand this.
And yet I persist in this quixotic endevour
and indeed, these days I harbor new hopes.
Some day, a fleet of microscopes will capture every neuron and every synapse
in a vast database of images.
And some day, artificially intelligent supercomputers
will analyze the images without human assistance.
to summarize them in a connectome.
I do not know, but I hope that I will see that day.
Because finding an entire human conectome
is one of the greatest technological challenges of all time.
It will take the work of generations
to succeed.
At the present time, my collaborators and I
what we're aiming for is much more modest.
Just to find partial connectomes of tiny parts
of mouse and human brains.
But even that would be enough for the first test of this hypothesis.
That I am my connectome.
For now, let me try to convince you of the plausibility of this hypothesis,
that it's actually worth taking seriously.
As you grow during childhood and
age during adulthood
your personal identity changes slowly.
Likewise, every connectome
changes over time.
What kinds of changes happen?
well, neurons, like trees, can grow new branches.
And they can lose old ones.
Synapses can be created
and they can be eliminated.
And synapses can grow larger
and they can grow smaller.
Second question: What causes these changes?
Well, it's true,
to some extent, they are programmed by your genes.
But that's not the whole story.
Because there are signals.
Electrical signals that travel through the branches of neurons
and chemical signals that jump across from branch to branch.
These signals are called neural activity.
And there's a lot of evidence that neural activity
is encoding our thoughts, feelings and perceptions, our mental experiences.
And there's a lot of evidence that neural activity
can cause your connections to change.
And if you put those 2 facts together,
it means that your experiences can change your connectome.
And that's why every connectome is unique.
Even those of genetically identical twins.
The connectome is where nature
meets nurture.
And it might be true that, just the mere act of thinking
can change your connectome.
An idea that you may find empowering.
What's in this picture?
A cool and refreshing stream of water, you say.
What else is in this picture?
Do not forget that (roove) and the earth call the stream bed.
without it, the water would not know which direction to flow.
And with this stream
I would like to propose a metaphor for the relationship between neural activity
and connectivity.
Neural activity is constantly changing.
It's like the water of the stream, it never sits still.
The connections of the brains neural network
determine the pathways along which neural activity flows.
And so the connectome is like the bed of the stream.
But the metaphor is richer than that.
Because it's true,
that the stream bed guides the flow of the water.
But over long timescales,
The water also reshapes the bed of the stream.
And as I told you just now, neural activity can change the connectome.
And if you'll allow me to ascend to metaphorical heights,
I will remind you that neural activity is the physical basis
or so neuroscientists think, of thoughts, feelings and perceptions.
And so we might even speak of the stream of consciousness .
Neural activity is it's water.
and the connectome is it's bed.
So let's return from the heights of metaphor,
and return to science.
Suppose our technologies for finding connectomes
actually work. How will we go about testing the hypothesis
I am my connectome?
Well, I propose a direct test.
Let us attempt to read out memories
from connectomes.
Consider the memory of long temporal sequences of movements.
Like a pianist playing a Beethoven Sonata.
According to a theory that dates back to the 19th century,
such memories are stored as chains of synaptic connections
inside your brain.
Because if the first neurons in the chain are activated,
through their synapses they send messages to the second neurons
which are activated, and so on down the line,
like a chain of falling dominos.
And this sequence of neural activation
is hypothesized to be the neural basis of the sequence of movements.
So one way to try to test the theory is to look for such chains
inside connectomes.
But it won't be easy, because they're not gonna look like this.
They're going to be scrambled up.
And so we're going to have to use our computers to try to unscramble
the chain.
And if we can do that, the sequence of the neurons we recover
from that unscrambling will be a prediction
Of the pattern of neural activity that is replayed in the brain
during memory recall.
And if that were successful, that would be the first example of reading a memory from a connectome.
What a mess.
Have you ever tried to wire up a system as complex as this?
I hope not. But if you have then you know t's very easy to make a mistake.
The branches of neurons are like the wires of the brain.
Can anyone guess what's the total length of wires in your brain?
I'll give you a hint, it's a big number.
I estimate millions of miles.
All packed in your skull.
And if you appreciate that number,
you can easily see there is huge potential for miswiring of the brain.
And indeed the popular press
loves headlines like :
Anorexic brains are wired differently, or autistic brains are wired differently
These are plausible claims
but in truth, we can't see the brains
wiring clearly enough to know if these are really true.
And so the technologies for seeing connectomes
will allow us to finally read
miswiring of the brain, to see mental disorders
in connectomes.
Sometimes
The best way to test a hypothesis
is to consider it's most extreme implication.
Philosophers know this game very well.
If you believe that I am my connectome
I think you must also accept the idea that
death is the destruction of your connectome.
I mention this because there are prophets today, who
claim that technology
will fundamentally alter the human condition.
And perhaps even transform the human species.
One of their most cherished dreams is to
cheat death, by that practice known as cryonics.
If you pay $100.000 you can arrange to have your body
frozen after death and stored in liquid nitrogen
in one of these tanks in an Arizona warehouse.
awaiting a future civilization advanced enough to resurrect you.
Should we ridicule the modern seekers of immortality,
calling them fools?
Or will t hey some day chuckle over our graves?
I don't know, I prefer to test their beliefs.
Scientifically.
I propose that we attempt
to find the connectome of a frozen brain.
We know that damage to the brain occurs
after death and during freezing, the question is
has that damage erased the connectome?
If it has, there is no way that any future civilization will be able to recover the memories of
these frozen brains.
Resurrection might succeed for the body,
but not for the mind.
On the other hand, if the connectome is still intact,
we cannot ridicule the claims of cryonics
so easily.
I've described a quest that begins
in the world of the very small and propels us to the world
of the far future.
Connectomes will mark a turning point in human history.
as we evolve from our ape-like ancestors,
on the African savanna, what distinguished us was our larger brains.
We have used our brains to fashion evermore amazing technologies.
Eventually, these technologies will become so powerful
that we will use them to know ourselves.
By deconstructing and reconstructing
our own brains.
I believe that this voyage of self discovery
is not just for scientists.
but for all of us.
And I am grateful for the opportunity to share this voyage with you
today.
Thank you.
The precision of a watch
is a function of it's movement.
For Rolex and for Hans Wilsdorf
to guarantee the precision of a time piece
the pressing question was how to protect the movement itself
from the elements. not only water, but
also tiny particles of dust.
In 1926
a major step was taken with the creation of the worlds
first waterproof and dust proof wristwatch
The Rolex Oyster was born.
Over the years
subtle changes in the design continued to improve
the Oyster, adding more comfort, while keeping the style
contemporary.
And, along with style, more functions have been added.
A Rolex wristwatch was the first to show the date
through a small aperture on the face
It was also the first wristwatch to spell out the day of the week
in full.
In the early 1950's
Rolex developed professional watches
who's functions went far beyond telling the time.
Launched in 1953,
the submariner was the first Rolex watch
guaranteed waterproof to a depth of 330 feet
Already on an incredible journey of innovation and design
Rolex decided to push the boundaries
even further.
In 1960,
The (batyscaf Triast) and Rolex made history.
The submersible successfully dived 35.800 feet below the surface of the ocean.
A Rolex deep sea special was strapped to the outside.
The development of undersea exploration
Lead to the launching in 1967
of the sea-dweller 2000. Waterproof to a depth of 2000 feet.
In 2008, the Submariner
in gold is redesigned
and the case features are new.
Unidirectional rotatable bezel
with a (serachrome) disc
Fitted with the patented Rolex ring lock system
The Rolex Deepsea safely descends to 12.800 feet.
Rolex has incorporated
countless hours and more than a century of experience
years of research,
innovation and development,
into every one of its models.
And the benefits arising from this work
including waterproofness
precision and durability
are the result of Rolex's continuous pursuit
of perfection.
From the most elegant and prestigious models,
To the professional time pieces,
all are exquisitely crafted.
Piece by piece, we design
and manufacture every single watch
And the story continues.