Watch videos with subtitles in your language, upload your videos, create your own subtitles! Click here to learn more on "how to Dotsub"

Sebastian Seung: I am my connectome

0 (0 Likes / 0 Dislikes)
We live in a remarkable time. The age of genomics. Your genome is the entire sequence of your DNA. Your sequence and mine are slightly different. That's why we look different. I've got brown eyes, you might have blue, or gray. But it's not just skin deep. The headlights tell us that genes can give us scary diseases, maybe even shape our personality, or give us mental disorders. Our genes seem to have awesome power over our destinies. And yet... I would like to think that I am more than my genes. What do you guys think? Are you more than your genes? Yes? I think some people agr- I think some people agree with me I think we should make a statement. I think we should say it all together. Alright? I am more than my genes. All together. I am more than my genes! What am I? I am my connectome. And since you guys are really great, maybe you can humor me and say this all together too? Right? All together now. I am my connectome. Oof, that sounded great. You know, you guys are so great. You don't even know what a connectome is, and you're willing to play along with me. I can just go home now. Well, so far, only one connectome is known. that of this tiny worm. It's modest nervous system consists of just 300 neurons. And in the 1970's and 80's a team of scientists mapped all 7000 connections between the neurons. In this diagram, every node is a neuron and every line is a connection. This is the connectome of the worm C.elegans. Your connectome is far more complex than this. because your brain contains 100 billion neurons and 10.000 times as many connections. There's a diagram like this for your brain, but there's no way it would fit on this slide. Your connectome contains one million times more connections than your genome has letters. That's a lot of information. What's in that information? We don't know for sure but there are theories. Since the 19th century, neuroscientists have speculated That maybe your memories, the information that makes you, you.... maybe your memories are stored in the connections between your brains neurons. And perhaps other aspects of your personal identity, maybe your personality and your intelect maybe they're also encoded in the connections between your neurons. And so, now, you can see why I proposed this hypothesis on "I am my connectome." I didn't ask you to chant it because it's true. I just want you to remember it. And in fact, we don't know if this hypothesis is correct, because we have never had technologies powerful enough to test it. Finding that worm connectome took over a dozen years of tedious labor. And to find the connectome to brains more like our own We need more sofisticated technologies, that are automated, that will speed up the process of finding connectomes. And in the next few minutes, I'll tell you about some of these technologies which are currently under development in my lab and the labs of my collaborators. Now you've probably seen pictures of neurons before, you can recognize them instantly by their fantastic shapes. They extend long and delicate branches and in short, they look like trees. But this is just a single neuron. In order to find a connectome, we have to see all the neurons at the same time. So let's meet Bobby Kasthury who works in the laboratory of Jeff Lickman at Harvard university. Bobby is holding fantastically thin slices of a mouse brain. and we're zooming in by a factor of 1.000 times. To obtain the resolution, So that we can see the branches of neurons all at the same time. Except, you still may not really recognize them and that's because we have to work in 3 dimensions. if we take many images of many slices of the brain and stack them up, we get a 3 dimensional image. and still you may not see the branches. So we start at the top, and we color in the cross section of one branch in red. And we do that for the next slice. And for the next slice. and we keep on doing that, slice after slice. If we continue through the entire stack, We can reconstruct the 3 dimensional shape of a small fragment of a branch of a neuron. and we can do that for another neuron in green. And you can see that the green neuron touches the red neuron in 2 locations. And these are what are called "Synapses" . Let's zoom in on one synapse and keep your eyes on the interior of the green neuron. You should see small circles. These are called "vesicles" They contain a molecule known as a neurotransmitter. And so when the green neuron wants to communicate, wants to send a message to the red neuron it spits out neurotransmitter. At the synapse, the two neurons are said to be connected. Like two friends talking on the telephone. So you've seen how to find a synapse. How can we find an entire connectome? Well we take this 3 dimensional stack of images and treat it as a gigantic 3 dimensional coloring book. We color every neuron in in a different color and then we look through all the images, find the synapses, and note the colors of the 2 neurons involved in each synapse. If we can do that throughout all the images, we could find a connectome. Now at this point, you've learned the basics of neurons and synapses, and I think we're ready to tackle one of the most important questions in neuroscience. How are the brains of men and women different? according to this self help book, guys brains are like waffles. They keep their lives compartmentalized in boxes. Girl's brains are like spaghetti. Everything in their life is connected to everything else. You guys are laughing, but you know, this book changed my life! But seriously, what's wrong with this? You already know enough to tell me, what's wrong with this statement? It doesn't matter whether you're a guy or a girl, everyone's brains are like spaghetti. Or maybe really really fine capellini with Branches. Just as one strand of spaghetti contacts many other strands on your plate one neuron touches many other neurons through their entangled branches. One neuron can be connected to so many other neurons because there can be synapses at these points of contact. By now you might have sort of lost perspective on how large this cube of brain tissue actually is. And so let's do a series of comparisons to show you. I assure you this is very tiny, it's just 6 microns on a side. So here's how it stacks up against an entire neuron. And you can tell that really, only the smallest fragments of branches are contained inside this cube. And a neuron, well, that smaller than brain, and that's just a mouse brain. It's a lot smaller than a human brain. So when I show my friends this, sometimes they told me, You know Sebastian, you should just give up. Neuroscience is hopeless. Because if you look at a brain with the naked eye, you don't really see how complex it is but when you use a microscope, finally the hidden complexity is revealed. In the 17th century the mathematician and philosopher, Blaise Pascal, wrote of his dread of the infinite. His feeling of insignificance and contemplating the fast reaches of outer space. And as a scientist, I'm not supposed to talk about my feelings, too much information, professor. But may I? I feel curiosity. And I feel wonder. But at times, I have also felt dispair. Why did I choose to study this organ that is so awesome in it's complexity, that it might well be infinite? It's absurd! How can we even dare to think, that we might ever understand this. And yet I persist in this quixotic endevour and indeed, these days I harbor new hopes. Some day, a fleet of microscopes will capture every neuron and every synapse in a vast database of images. And some day, artificially intelligent supercomputers will analyze the images without human assistance. to summarize them in a connectome. I do not know, but I hope that I will see that day. Because finding an entire human conectome is one of the greatest technological challenges of all time. It will take the work of generations to succeed. At the present time, my collaborators and I what we're aiming for is much more modest. Just to find partial connectomes of tiny parts of mouse and human brains. But even that would be enough for the first test of this hypothesis. That I am my connectome. For now, let me try to convince you of the plausibility of this hypothesis, that it's actually worth taking seriously. As you grow during childhood and age during adulthood your personal identity changes slowly. Likewise, every connectome changes over time. What kinds of changes happen? well, neurons, like trees, can grow new branches. And they can lose old ones. Synapses can be created and they can be eliminated. And synapses can grow larger and they can grow smaller. Second question: What causes these changes? Well, it's true, to some extent, they are programmed by your genes. But that's not the whole story. Because there are signals. Electrical signals that travel through the branches of neurons and chemical signals that jump across from branch to branch. These signals are called neural activity. And there's a lot of evidence that neural activity is encoding our thoughts, feelings and perceptions, our mental experiences. And there's a lot of evidence that neural activity can cause your connections to change. And if you put those 2 facts together, it means that your experiences can change your connectome. And that's why every connectome is unique. Even those of genetically identical twins. The connectome is where nature meets nurture. And it might be true that, just the mere act of thinking can change your connectome. An idea that you may find empowering. What's in this picture? A cool and refreshing stream of water, you say. What else is in this picture? Do not forget that (roove) and the earth call the stream bed. without it, the water would not know which direction to flow. And with this stream I would like to propose a metaphor for the relationship between neural activity and connectivity. Neural activity is constantly changing. It's like the water of the stream, it never sits still. The connections of the brains neural network determine the pathways along which neural activity flows. And so the connectome is like the bed of the stream. But the metaphor is richer than that. Because it's true, that the stream bed guides the flow of the water. But over long timescales, The water also reshapes the bed of the stream. And as I told you just now, neural activity can change the connectome. And if you'll allow me to ascend to metaphorical heights, I will remind you that neural activity is the physical basis or so neuroscientists think, of thoughts, feelings and perceptions. And so we might even speak of the stream of consciousness . Neural activity is it's water. and the connectome is it's bed. So let's return from the heights of metaphor, and return to science. Suppose our technologies for finding connectomes actually work. How will we go about testing the hypothesis I am my connectome? Well, I propose a direct test. Let us attempt to read out memories from connectomes. Consider the memory of long temporal sequences of movements. Like a pianist playing a Beethoven Sonata. According to a theory that dates back to the 19th century, such memories are stored as chains of synaptic connections inside your brain. Because if the first neurons in the chain are activated, through their synapses they send messages to the second neurons which are activated, and so on down the line, like a chain of falling dominos. And this sequence of neural activation is hypothesized to be the neural basis of the sequence of movements. So one way to try to test the theory is to look for such chains inside connectomes. But it won't be easy, because they're not gonna look like this. They're going to be scrambled up. And so we're going to have to use our computers to try to unscramble the chain. And if we can do that, the sequence of the neurons we recover from that unscrambling will be a prediction Of the pattern of neural activity that is replayed in the brain during memory recall. And if that were successful, that would be the first example of reading a memory from a connectome. What a mess. Have you ever tried to wire up a system as complex as this? I hope not. But if you have then you know t's very easy to make a mistake. The branches of neurons are like the wires of the brain. Can anyone guess what's the total length of wires in your brain? I'll give you a hint, it's a big number. I estimate millions of miles. All packed in your skull. And if you appreciate that number, you can easily see there is huge potential for miswiring of the brain. And indeed the popular press loves headlines like : Anorexic brains are wired differently, or autistic brains are wired differently These are plausible claims but in truth, we can't see the brains wiring clearly enough to know if these are really true. And so the technologies for seeing connectomes will allow us to finally read miswiring of the brain, to see mental disorders in connectomes. Sometimes The best way to test a hypothesis is to consider it's most extreme implication. Philosophers know this game very well. If you believe that I am my connectome I think you must also accept the idea that death is the destruction of your connectome. I mention this because there are prophets today, who claim that technology will fundamentally alter the human condition. And perhaps even transform the human species. One of their most cherished dreams is to cheat death, by that practice known as cryonics. If you pay $100.000 you can arrange to have your body frozen after death and stored in liquid nitrogen in one of these tanks in an Arizona warehouse. awaiting a future civilization advanced enough to resurrect you. Should we ridicule the modern seekers of immortality, calling them fools? Or will t hey some day chuckle over our graves? I don't know, I prefer to test their beliefs. Scientifically. I propose that we attempt to find the connectome of a frozen brain. We know that damage to the brain occurs after death and during freezing, the question is has that damage erased the connectome? If it has, there is no way that any future civilization will be able to recover the memories of these frozen brains. Resurrection might succeed for the body, but not for the mind. On the other hand, if the connectome is still intact, we cannot ridicule the claims of cryonics so easily. I've described a quest that begins in the world of the very small and propels us to the world of the far future. Connectomes will mark a turning point in human history. as we evolve from our ape-like ancestors, on the African savanna, what distinguished us was our larger brains. We have used our brains to fashion evermore amazing technologies. Eventually, these technologies will become so powerful that we will use them to know ourselves. By deconstructing and reconstructing our own brains. I believe that this voyage of self discovery is not just for scientists. but for all of us. And I am grateful for the opportunity to share this voyage with you today. Thank you. The precision of a watch is a function of it's movement. For Rolex and for Hans Wilsdorf to guarantee the precision of a time piece the pressing question was how to protect the movement itself from the elements. not only water, but also tiny particles of dust. In 1926 a major step was taken with the creation of the worlds first waterproof and dust proof wristwatch The Rolex Oyster was born. Over the years subtle changes in the design continued to improve the Oyster, adding more comfort, while keeping the style contemporary. And, along with style, more functions have been added. A Rolex wristwatch was the first to show the date through a small aperture on the face It was also the first wristwatch to spell out the day of the week in full. In the early 1950's Rolex developed professional watches who's functions went far beyond telling the time. Launched in 1953, the submariner was the first Rolex watch guaranteed waterproof to a depth of 330 feet Already on an incredible journey of innovation and design Rolex decided to push the boundaries even further. In 1960, The (batyscaf Triast) and Rolex made history. The submersible successfully dived 35.800 feet below the surface of the ocean. A Rolex deep sea special was strapped to the outside. The development of undersea exploration Lead to the launching in 1967 of the sea-dweller 2000. Waterproof to a depth of 2000 feet. In 2008, the Submariner in gold is redesigned and the case features are new. Unidirectional rotatable bezel with a (serachrome) disc Fitted with the patented Rolex ring lock system The Rolex Deepsea safely descends to 12.800 feet. Rolex has incorporated countless hours and more than a century of experience years of research, innovation and development, into every one of its models. And the benefits arising from this work including waterproofness precision and durability are the result of Rolex's continuous pursuit of perfection. From the most elegant and prestigious models, To the professional time pieces, all are exquisitely crafted. Piece by piece, we design and manufacture every single watch And the story continues.

Video Details

Duration: 22 minutes and 34 seconds
Country: Brazil
Language: English
Producer: ted
Director: ted
Views: 99
Posted by: zeitgeistbrasil on Sep 29, 2010

http://www.ted.com Sebastian Seung is mapping a massively ambitious new model of the brain that focuses on the connections between each neuron. He calls it our "connectome," and it's as individual as our genome -- and understanding it could open a new way to understand our brains and our minds.

Caption and Translate

    Sign In/Register for Dotsub above to caption this video.