RSA Animate - The Power of Networks
0 (0 Likes / 0 Dislikes)
Manuel Lima. The Power of Networks
I'm going to talk today about the power of networks and the challenge of mapping an
increasingly complex world.
And I actually gonna start this talk
with trees. Trees have actually been really important religious symbols over the ages.
We can see trees all the way back from ancient Babylon to
Judaism.
Through ofcourse Christianity.
But even more than religious symbols
trees have really been important knowledge classification systems.
Throughout the ages as well
mapping a variety of aspects, mapping
blood ties between people, of course,
mapping
the main characters and stories told in the Bible,
mapping also the main areas of science,
and even mapping, of course species, the various species in the planet and again
using the tree metaphor on and on and on.
This widespread metaphor it's so so popular because it really expresses a human desire
for order.
For symmetry, for hierarchy,
for simplicity, for balance and unity. Trees are really an embodiment of
the simple way we like to look at the world.
And one of the oldest trees of knowledge known to men this was actually devised by
Aristotle himself.
This beautiful tree of knowledge that
tries to come up with a universal structure for everything that we know
across the world you know.
from living bodies, animals, humans.
And it was considered to be the first tree of knowledge and since than it has grown a lot
more knowledge since then.
in my view we are reading this turning point
from trees to networks.
We are really facing a paradigm shift. The paradigm shift in the sense that trees
are now no longer able to really accommodate the inherent complexities of
the modern world.
And this happens of course for a series of reasons.
One of the best articles i've read on this topic was written by
warren weaver american scientist.
In 1948 he wrote an article uh...
on the topic of organized complexity
and Weaver basically divides modern science into three different stages
the first one covering the seventeen, eighteen, nineteen century to what we
consider to be the problems of simplicity.
During this period scientists were primarily concerned about one element
influences the other
uh... moving to the second stage of modern science you know, Scientists really
became aware that it's not just you know one of two elements going on there's a
lot more elements
in our planet.
But to some extent the way that they were sort of connected was fairly
chaotic, fairly random.
At least it was thought during that time, this covering at least the first half of
the twentieth century to what we would consider to be problems of disorganized
complexity
Leading of course to the end of the twentieth century in the current century where we are
now
Scientists of course became much-much more aware it's not just a huge viriables going on
that's not just a huge number of elements in our planet but they are also
all interconnected and all interdependent.
to what we consider to be problems of organized complexity.
and you can really see these problems of organized complexity
in a way that trees are unable to sort of suffice
in many different areas. We can see those problems of organized complexity in the way we try
to unravel our eco-systems.
So no more we had this you know extremely simplified
predator versus pray
diagrams, right?
We.. Our understanding
our eco-systems in much more complex way.
This is at the diagram
of all the spieces that interact with cods(fish) is actually close to one hundred species
Hundred species interact with cods.
In the... off the coast of North Eastern Canada.
and you can really see actually cod is right in the middle, you can actually
hardly see because of the mass of line
but it's quite incredible
i think the amount of
uh... interactions that exists within those spiece, again this complexity
of eco-systems that we have around us.
we also see
these problems of organized complexity
in the way we try to decode our own brain
so, you know, before we used to think about the brain as a modular
centralized organ where different area was responsible for given set of
actions of behaviors.
it's kind of appealing to think about the brain as a central element
responsible for
a variety of actions but of course
it's not central at all. The more we realize that
you know our brain is really almost like a music symphony
played by hundreds and thousands of instruments.
This is
one of the most complex maps of the brain,
it was
created by the Blue Brain project which is
you know very much related to the human genome project. It's at least
same kind of scale
uh... and it's mapping
ten thousand neurons, it's mapping thirty million connections
between those neurons
uh... and it's just ten percent of the human neuro-cortex. That's it, ten
percent.
It's really remarkable to have the first sort of map
of the neuron complexities of the brain.
we also see these forms of organized complex in the way we
categorize knowledge.
This is one of the most beautiful trees-representations, this was created
for the french encyclopedia
uh... the biggest encycolpedia of thay time created by Diderot & d'Alambert
you know that the big sort of encyclopedia of enlightment.
This really represents the enlightment in many ways,
but even though he was brilliant at the time 1751, he really represents
knowledge as a tree where branches don't really touch each other
Right? I mean they touch on the diagram, they have no connections.
They have no
ties between them, it's individual branches that branch off and no there's no
connection whatsoever.
In comparison you can actually see here, these are two maps of wikipedia
and wikipedia is of course all of you know, it's really one of the largest
rhizomatic structures ever created by man.
you can really understand
that by looking at this maps and of course using wikipedia as we have
done probably several times already
that knowledge is highly interconnected.
You know, just like a network, really?
I mean you can actually see here some topics like mathematics and others
and they have immence connections with other widespread areas of knowledge, apperently widespread
but
sharing a lot of ties.
we also see these form of organized complexities
in the way we try to organize ourselves
And this has been
through all times especially after the industrial revolution where
this notion of top-down hierarchy became so prevalent in instituion,
society, companies, government et cetera
But this is you know the typical
organization chart where
again the top down all the way
from the president to the individual workmen down below.
But of course we are much more idiosyncratic beings as we all know
and the internet is really drastically changing this paradigm of looking at
social structures from a hierarchical point of view of tree structure.
This is a map
of online social corporation between peel developers
And perl is a very famous programming language.
And here you can actually see
thousands of
of people collaborating in a variety of projects
and you know sharing this
you're very network structure which is the opposite of again any sort of
hierarchy
there's no leader per se, they just freely cooperate online
uh... to achieve different projects
we also see this kind of
paradigm shift
in the in the way we look at that nature, right? In the way we ordered nature itself.
So the image that you have on the left side(as a big fan of Darwin myself) this is
actually the only illustration that darwin had
in the "Origin of species".
What he denominated to be the tree of life.
And of course since then you know in the past on hundred and fifty years many
scientists have evolved this tree of life.
uh... and off course on the right is a typical top-down hierarchical structure
that we have. To categorize every single species on earth that we know.
Again all the way from domain to the individual spieces, homo sapiens that you see for the human.
But this was actually
being changing drastically.
Very recently scientists really discovered that overlaying this tree of life, the original tree of life
provided by Darwin
There is a dense network of bacteria
and this bacteria is actually tying very disparate species and making them
really close together.
And if you consider that roughly ninety percent of the human body is made of
bacteria in ourselves
you can really understand the significance of this discovery
and a lot of scientists are really calling this the web of life,
it's not that the tree of life anymore it's web of life, it's the network of life.
Networks are truly everywhere, it is this only present structure
the brain
is network of neuro-cells connected by axons, cells themselves
and of course molecules
societies as we all know are networks of people linked by different types of
ties.
Of course on a larger scale you can think about food webs and eco-systems as we
saw before as networks of species.
And of course
networks pervade
human technology from the internet, power-grids and transportation systems.
And then finally i would just like to end with a little bit of teaser
Is there such a thing as a Universal Structure?
I love this comparison.
so what you have on the left side is the neuro-network of a
mouse
from two thousand six, which at this scale is pretty much similar to our own.
And on the right side is the "Millennium Simulation" (project).
It was the largest and most realistic simulation of the growth of cosmic
structure and the formation of galaxies.
It was able to recreate the evolition through an approximately twenty
million galaxies
in approximately 25TB
and here again
you have to same comparison just on a different scale, a neuro-network of a mouse
very similar to our own.
and the Millemium simulation on a different scale.
and for me coincidentally or not I just fine this comparisons striking on
so many different levels.
between the smaller scale of knowledge, of human knowledge and a larger scale of knowledge
the universe itself.
all how everything is really-really so similar. Are we in the present of this
universal structure
being the network?
Even more than the idea of representing this complex system
is the need for new way of thinking.
and his new way of thinking is about thispluralistic way of thinking and
that everything is interconnected and everything is interdependent. We're almost going back to
the polymath, the renaissance man mentality that
you know about being a
specialist in one area, you need to know a little bit of everything or at least create
outbound ties that you are able to learn from other distant areas.
I think this is the most beautiful aspect of knowledge that we can
take into consideration by
looking at this network thinking.
It's more important even that we actually make that
mental shift.
Because I think there's an immense benefit
that can come
from this network outlook of the world itself.
Transcribed for https://vk.com/make_ideas_not_war