Transcript for Power of Common Sense: Peer Review in Science Questioned

as reported by the 'bell fast' telegraph: Scientist reverse aging process

a verge reverse aging has been discovered

which allows 'withered' muscle to rebuild itself, by turning back a biological 'clock'

the effect has already been demonstrated, on human muscle tissue in the laboratory

Scientists in the US. believe the breakthrough

could lead to 'new treatments' that rejuvenate and strengthen aging bodies

or combat, to generative diseases

their findings also underline, the importance of staying 'active', for older people

Since this reduce, age related muscle lost

what 'practical' value, does money and time 'spent' on ways

to reverse the aging process have?

when at this very moment, millions of people exist in poverty without 'food'

to nourish themselves

what 'practical value' does money and time spend on prolong the Lifes

of the 'elderly' of the world 'have'?

when at this very moment, 'children' are sick, and dying of malnutrition, and famine

Why is it that 'poverty', starvation, circumstances of desperation and misery

experienced by human beings

is 'accepted', and not given priority attention?

why has a solution 'not been found', to the suffering and death

of millions of human beings, that occurs at this very moment

Why is, 'combating' the aging process, and retaining a youthful body and appearance

giving 'funding' and attention, as a priority area of scientific research, and development

who is 'reviewing' such research? who is proving the funds?

No doubt, those who would want to prolong their own Life

does not the acceptance of such area of research, and development

as having 'priority', over the end of 'starvation', and death of millions of children

revealed that the majority of the scientific community, is not considering

the 'betterment', and wellbeing of humanity

Despite! it claims to be doing so

Does it not revealed, that the majority of the scientific community, is programmed

not to see 'common sense', and consider what actually 'requires' our attention in this reality

what actually requires 'a solution', above all else

does it not also revealed

that the majority of 'human beings' are 'programmed', not to see common sense

and do not regard, the major problems of humanity, as 'priority concerns'

Peer review is part of the problem

it is common sense, that funding and support should be given

to those areas of research and development, which exist within the starting point

of establishing and implementing 'solutions', for the betterment of Life

for all human beings 'equally'

In this, the primary problems of starvation, 'lack', non-access to electricity

health care and education, should be given 'absolute priority'

within the considerations, of those who are 'reviewing'

and deciding the 'value', and attention, given to proposed scientific research and development

because it is 'common sense', that until humanity as a whole

sorts out its equilibrium, and 'correct' the current design of the world system -

which is inequality, self-interest, and 'disregard' for the suffering of the 'many'

in favor of giving attention, to the 'wants' and 'desires' of the few with 'money'

that 'any claim' by science, to exist with the betterment and wellbeing of humanity

is a dishonest, and delusional statement

however it is 'seen' that peer review

which 'should', be undertaken by a community of human beings as 'peers'

equal in the consideration, of what 'best' supports humanity, 'as a whole'

in common 'sense', not influenced or limited, by personal motives, self-definitions

a pre-defined knowledge base, desires, beliefs or opinions

it's rather undertaken, by a group of people existing within 'the same'

or similar knowledge base, and ideology

as those, submitting their ideas and research for review

yet within a definition of peer review, it is stated:

that a community of experts in a given 'field - is required'

who are qualified, to perform an impartial review

the only impartiality evident

is the impartiality towards, what in common 'sense', should be considered

within a 'review' of any 'proposed' area of scientific research, funding and development

which is what actually is considering

'a solution' to the priority problems of humanity, at this moment

it is evident

that human beings are 'programmed', to accept science and scientists

to exist, apart from the rest, within their own bubble of 'superiority' as knowledge

and that the majority of human beings

do not take it upon themselves, to evaluate the starting point of science

within seeing, what actually considers

'the betterment' of the Lifes of all humanity as 'a whole', as equals

this reveals, that human beings

do not take it upon themselves, to evaluate their own starting point

and that all exist, within the consideration of only their own, 'personal-interests'

and it is also evident, in the nature of the majority of scientific 'research'

that within a scientific community, the common sense evaluation of one's starting point

within considering, if the research being participated in

Actually is 'relevant', to the points in this world that require attention, is neglected

What is needed is a 'community', a group of people

that take it upon themselves to evaluate, and purify their own starting point

through self-honesty and common 'sense'

and to evaluate the starting point of 'actions' taken by all the major institutions of this world

within the consideration, of what actually supports the 'wellbeing', of all humanity

what is needed, is a group of people willing to develop 'common sense' in all ways

and to take the action required to 'spread awareness' -

that there exist a monstrous 'waste' of resources and 'money'

within the 'pursuit' of research and development, in areas of science

and other institutions

resources and 'money', that could be used

to achieve an 'equal' quality, and standard of Life, for all humanity

It's time to wake up from the delusion of belief, that 'science' is here for the benefit of humanity

It's time to ask the question: Where is the voice of the people?

and isn't that the people's "duty"? isn't it "our" duty?

to 'be the voice' of those in this world, who are not able 'to have a voice'

For discussion visit: www.desteni.co.za

For Regular Updates: Join, Beyond the grave: www.YouTube.com

More more recently departed and MISSING CHILDREN: www.desteni-universe.co.za

CC English for Desteni Productions ©