Don't want to see Ads? Register for your free dotSUB account here!
Power of Common Sense: Peer Review in Science Questioned
Duration:
7 minutes and 50 seconds
Country:
South Africa
Language:
English
Genre:
Instructional
Producer:
Desteni Production
Views:
83
(3
embedded)
Posted by:
desteniteam1 on Oct 23, 2009
Desteni
Translate and Transcribe
-
Sign In/Register for dotSUB to translate this video.
Share
- Embed Video
- Embed normal player
- Embed a smaller player
- Advanced Embedding Options
-
Embedding OptionsSize:Language:Embed Code
- Embed transcript
- Embed transcript in:
-
Invite a user to dotSUB
Your invitation to join dotSUB was successfulThere was an error inviting that user to dotSUB
Video Transcription
Show in new window
- as reported by the 'bell fast' telegraph: Scientist reverse aging process
- a verge reverse aging has been discovered
- which allows 'withered' muscle to rebuild itself, by turning back a biological 'clock'
- the effect has already been demonstrated, on human muscle tissue in the laboratory
- Scientists in the US. believe the breakthrough
- could lead to 'new treatments' that rejuvenate and strengthen aging bodies
- or combat, to generative diseases
- their findings also underline, the importance of staying 'active', for older people
- Since this reduce, age related muscle lost
- what 'practical' value, does money and time 'spent' on ways
- to reverse the aging process have?
- when at this very moment, millions of people exist in poverty without 'food'
- to nourish themselves
- what 'practical value' does money and time spend on prolong the Lifes
- of the 'elderly' of the world 'have'?
- when at this very moment, 'children' are sick, and dying of malnutrition, and famine
- Why is it that 'poverty', starvation, circumstances of desperation and misery
- experienced by human beings
- is 'accepted', and not given priority attention?
- why has a solution 'not been found', to the suffering and death
- of millions of human beings, that occurs at this very moment
- Why is, 'combating' the aging process, and retaining a youthful body and appearance
- giving 'funding' and attention, as a priority area of scientific research, and development
- who is 'reviewing' such research? who is proving the funds?
- No doubt, those who would want to prolong their own Life
- does not the acceptance of such area of research, and development
- as having 'priority', over the end of 'starvation', and death of millions of children
- revealed that the majority of the scientific community, is not considering
- the 'betterment', and wellbeing of humanity
- Despite! it claims to be doing so
- Does it not revealed, that the majority of the scientific community, is programmed
- not to see 'common sense', and consider what actually 'requires' our attention in this reality
- what actually requires 'a solution', above all else
- does it not also revealed
- that the majority of 'human beings' are 'programmed', not to see common sense
- and do not regard, the major problems of humanity, as 'priority concerns'
- Peer review is part of the problem
- it is common sense, that funding and support should be given
- to those areas of research and development, which exist within the starting point
- of establishing and implementing 'solutions', for the betterment of Life
- for all human beings 'equally'
- In this, the primary problems of starvation, 'lack', non-access to electricity
- health care and education, should be given 'absolute priority'
- within the considerations, of those who are 'reviewing'
- and deciding the 'value', and attention, given to proposed scientific research and development
- because it is 'common sense', that until humanity as a whole
- sorts out its equilibrium, and 'correct' the current design of the world system -
- which is inequality, self-interest, and 'disregard' for the suffering of the 'many'
- in favor of giving attention, to the 'wants' and 'desires' of the few with 'money'
- that 'any claim' by science, to exist with the betterment and wellbeing of humanity
- is a dishonest, and delusional statement
- however it is 'seen' that peer review
- which 'should', be undertaken by a community of human beings as 'peers'
- equal in the consideration, of what 'best' supports humanity, 'as a whole'
- in common 'sense', not influenced or limited, by personal motives, self-definitions
- a pre-defined knowledge base, desires, beliefs or opinions
- it's rather undertaken, by a group of people existing within 'the same'
- or similar knowledge base, and ideology
- as those, submitting their ideas and research for review
- yet within a definition of peer review, it is stated:
- that a community of experts in a given 'field - is required'
- who are qualified, to perform an impartial review
- the only impartiality evident
- is the impartiality towards, what in common 'sense', should be considered
- within a 'review' of any 'proposed' area of scientific research, funding and development
- which is what actually is considering
- 'a solution' to the priority problems of humanity, at this moment
- it is evident
- that human beings are 'programmed', to accept science and scientists
- to exist, apart from the rest, within their own bubble of 'superiority' as knowledge
- and that the majority of human beings
- do not take it upon themselves, to evaluate the starting point of science
- within seeing, what actually considers
- 'the betterment' of the Lifes of all humanity as 'a whole', as equals
- this reveals, that human beings
- do not take it upon themselves, to evaluate their own starting point
- and that all exist, within the consideration of only their own, 'personal-interests'
- and it is also evident, in the nature of the majority of scientific 'research'
- that within a scientific community, the common sense evaluation of one's starting point
- within considering, if the research being participated in
- Actually is 'relevant', to the points in this world that require attention, is neglected
- What is needed is a 'community', a group of people
- that take it upon themselves to evaluate, and purify their own starting point
- through self-honesty and common 'sense'
- and to evaluate the starting point of 'actions' taken by all the major institutions of this world
- within the consideration, of what actually supports the 'wellbeing', of all humanity
- what is needed, is a group of people willing to develop 'common sense' in all ways
- and to take the action required to 'spread awareness' -
- that there exist a monstrous 'waste' of resources and 'money'
- within the 'pursuit' of research and development, in areas of science
- and other institutions
- resources and 'money', that could be used
- to achieve an 'equal' quality, and standard of Life, for all humanity
- It's time to wake up from the delusion of belief, that 'science' is here for the benefit of humanity
- It's time to ask the question: Where is the voice of the people?
- and isn't that the people's "duty"? isn't it "our" duty?
- to 'be the voice' of those in this world, who are not able 'to have a voice'
- For discussion visit: www.desteni.co.za
- For Regular Updates: Join, Beyond the grave: www.YouTube.com
- More more recently departed and MISSING CHILDREN: www.desteni-universe.co.za
- CC English for Desteni Productions ©


Report this video as offensive