Power of Common Sense: Peer Review in Science Questioned

Duration: 7 minutes and 50 seconds

Country: South Africa

Language: English

License: CC - Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives

Genre: Instructional

Producer: Desteni Production

Views: 83 (3 embedded)

Posted by: desteniteam1 on Oct 23, 2009

Desteni

Report this video as offensive

Translate and Transcribe

Sign In/Register for dotSUB to translate this video.

Share

Embed Video
Embed normal player
Embed a smaller player
Advanced Embedding Options
Embedding Options

Size:

Language:

Embed Code
Embed transcript
Embed transcript in:
Invite a user to dotSUB

Your invitation to join dotSUB was successful

There was an error inviting that user to dotSUB

Video Transcription

Show in new window

as reported by the 'bell fast' telegraph: Scientist reverse aging process
a verge reverse aging has been discovered
which allows 'withered' muscle to rebuild itself, by turning back a biological 'clock'
the effect has already been demonstrated, on human muscle tissue in the laboratory
Scientists in the US. believe the breakthrough
could lead to 'new treatments' that rejuvenate and strengthen aging bodies
or combat, to generative diseases
their findings also underline, the importance of staying 'active', for older people
Since this reduce, age related muscle lost
what 'practical' value, does money and time 'spent' on ways
to reverse the aging process have?
when at this very moment, millions of people exist in poverty without 'food'
to nourish themselves
what 'practical value' does money and time spend on prolong the Lifes
of the 'elderly' of the world 'have'?
when at this very moment, 'children' are sick, and dying of malnutrition, and famine
Why is it that 'poverty', starvation, circumstances of desperation and misery
experienced by human beings
is 'accepted', and not given priority attention?
why has a solution 'not been found', to the suffering and death
of millions of human beings, that occurs at this very moment
Why is, 'combating' the aging process, and retaining a youthful body and appearance
giving 'funding' and attention, as a priority area of scientific research, and development
who is 'reviewing' such research? who is proving the funds?
No doubt, those who would want to prolong their own Life
does not the acceptance of such area of research, and development
as having 'priority', over the end of 'starvation', and death of millions of children
revealed that the majority of the scientific community, is not considering
the 'betterment', and wellbeing of humanity
Despite! it claims to be doing so
Does it not revealed, that the majority of the scientific community, is programmed
not to see 'common sense', and consider what actually 'requires' our attention in this reality
what actually requires 'a solution', above all else
does it not also revealed
that the majority of 'human beings' are 'programmed', not to see common sense
and do not regard, the major problems of humanity, as 'priority concerns'
Peer review is part of the problem
it is common sense, that funding and support should be given
to those areas of research and development, which exist within the starting point
of establishing and implementing 'solutions', for the betterment of Life
for all human beings 'equally'
In this, the primary problems of starvation, 'lack', non-access to electricity
health care and education, should be given 'absolute priority'
within the considerations, of those who are 'reviewing'
and deciding the 'value', and attention, given to proposed scientific research and development
because it is 'common sense', that until humanity as a whole
sorts out its equilibrium, and 'correct' the current design of the world system -
which is inequality, self-interest, and 'disregard' for the suffering of the 'many'
in favor of giving attention, to the 'wants' and 'desires' of the few with 'money'
that 'any claim' by science, to exist with the betterment and wellbeing of humanity
is a dishonest, and delusional statement
however it is 'seen' that peer review
which 'should', be undertaken by a community of human beings as 'peers'
equal in the consideration, of what 'best' supports humanity, 'as a whole'
in common 'sense', not influenced or limited, by personal motives, self-definitions
a pre-defined knowledge base, desires, beliefs or opinions
it's rather undertaken, by a group of people existing within 'the same'
or similar knowledge base, and ideology
as those, submitting their ideas and research for review
yet within a definition of peer review, it is stated:
that a community of experts in a given 'field - is required'
who are qualified, to perform an impartial review
the only impartiality evident
is the impartiality towards, what in common 'sense', should be considered
within a 'review' of any 'proposed' area of scientific research, funding and development
which is what actually is considering
'a solution' to the priority problems of humanity, at this moment
it is evident
that human beings are 'programmed', to accept science and scientists
to exist, apart from the rest, within their own bubble of 'superiority' as knowledge
and that the majority of human beings
do not take it upon themselves, to evaluate the starting point of science
within seeing, what actually considers
'the betterment' of the Lifes of all humanity as 'a whole', as equals
this reveals, that human beings
do not take it upon themselves, to evaluate their own starting point
and that all exist, within the consideration of only their own, 'personal-interests'
and it is also evident, in the nature of the majority of scientific 'research'
that within a scientific community, the common sense evaluation of one's starting point
within considering, if the research being participated in
Actually is 'relevant', to the points in this world that require attention, is neglected
What is needed is a 'community', a group of people
that take it upon themselves to evaluate, and purify their own starting point
through self-honesty and common 'sense'
and to evaluate the starting point of 'actions' taken by all the major institutions of this world
within the consideration, of what actually supports the 'wellbeing', of all humanity
what is needed, is a group of people willing to develop 'common sense' in all ways
and to take the action required to 'spread awareness' -
that there exist a monstrous 'waste' of resources and 'money'
within the 'pursuit' of research and development, in areas of science
and other institutions
resources and 'money', that could be used
to achieve an 'equal' quality, and standard of Life, for all humanity
It's time to wake up from the delusion of belief, that 'science' is here for the benefit of humanity
It's time to ask the question: Where is the voice of the people?
and isn't that the people's "duty"? isn't it "our" duty?
to 'be the voice' of those in this world, who are not able 'to have a voice'
For discussion visit: www.desteni.co.za
For Regular Updates: Join, Beyond the grave: www.YouTube.com
More more recently departed and MISSING CHILDREN: www.desteni-universe.co.za

Power of Common Sense: Peer Review in Science Questioned

Translate and Transcribe

Share

Video Transcription

Other videos from desteniteam1