Watch videos with subtitles in your language, upload your videos, create your own subtitles! Click here to learn more and view tutorials on "how to dotSUB"

Welcome to dotSUB!

Any Video Any Language


Here you can view, upload, transcribe and translate any video into any language. To create your own subtitles, click the button below and register.


Enterprise Solutions


dotSUB's Enterprise Solutions are a cost-effective platform for managing high-quality subtitles at scale, deploying them to video players and mobile devices, and providing interactive transcripts for enhanced SEO.


Who Uses dotSUB?

Language Services

Translation CMS

Captioning Laws

Testimonials


Sign up to our mailing list

Transcript for In My Language

Time Content
00:01 → 00:03

In My Language

03:13 → 03:15

A Translation

03:15 → 03:17

The previous part of this video

03:17 → 03:19

was in my native language.

03:19 → 03:21

Many people have assumed that

03:21 → 03:23

when I talk about this being my language

03:23 → 03:26

that means that each part of the video

03:26 → 03:29

must have a particular symbolic message within it

03:29 → 03:33

designed for the human mind to interpret.

03:33 → 03:35

But my language is not about designing

03:35 → 03:38

words or even visual symbols

03:38 → 03:40

for people to interpret.

03:41 → 03:43

It is about being in a constant conversation

03:43 → 03:46

with every aspect of my environment.

03:46 → 03:49

Reacting physically to all parts of my surroundings.

03:49 → 03:52

In this part of the video

03:52 → 03:54

the water doesn't symbolize anything.

03:54 → 03:56

I am just interacting with the water

03:56 → 03:59

as the water interacts with me.

03:59 → 04:02

Far from being purposeless, the way that I move

04:02 → 04:06

is an ongoing response to what is around me.

04:06 → 04:08

Ironically, the way that I move

04:08 → 04:11

when responding to everything around me

04:11 → 04:14

is described as "being in a world of my own"

04:14 → 04:16

whereas if I interact with a much more

04:16 → 04:18

limited set of responses

04:18 → 04:20

and only react to a much more

04:20 → 04:22

limited part of my surroundings

04:22 → 04:24

people claim that I am

04:24 → 04:26

"opening up to true interaction with the world"

04:26 → 04:30

They judge my existence, awareness and personhood

04:30 → 04:33

on which of a tiny and limited part of the world

04:34 → 04:36

I appear to be reacting to.

04:36 → 04:39

The way I naturally think and respond to things

04:39 → 04:42

looks and feels so different from standard concepts

04:42 → 04:44

or even visualization

04:44 → 04:47

that some people do not consider it thought at all

04:47 → 04:50

but it is a way of thinking in its own right.

04:50 → 04:52

However the thinking of people like me

04:52 → 04:54

is only taken seriously

04:54 → 04:56

if we learn your language,

04:56 → 05:00

no matter how we previously thought or interacted

05:00 → 05:01

As you heard

05:01 → 05:04

I can sing along with what is around me.

05:08 → 05:10

It is only when I type something in your language

05:11 → 05:14

that you refer to me as having communication.

05:15 → 05:18

I smell things.

05:20 → 05:24

I listen to things.

05:28 → 05:31

I feel things.

05:38 → 05:42

I taste things.

05:47 → 05:51

I look at things.

05:51 → 05:53

It is not enough to look and listen

05:53 → 05:55

and taste and smell and feel,

05:55 → 05:57

I have to do those to the right things

05:58 → 05:59

such as look at books

05:59 → 06:01

and fail to do them to the wrong things

06:01 → 06:04

or else people doubt that I am a thinking being

06:04 → 06:07

and since then their definition of thought

06:07 → 06:09

defines their definition of personhood

06:10 → 06:11

so ridiculously much

06:11 → 06:13

they doubt that I am a real person as well.

06:14 → 06:17

I would like to honestly know how many people

06:17 → 06:19

if you met me on the street

06:19 → 06:21

would believe I wrote this.

06:22 → 06:24

I find it very interesting by the way

06:24 → 06:26

that failure to learn your language

06:26 → 06:27

is seen as a deficit

06:27 → 06:30

but failure to learn my language

06:30 → 06:31

is seen as so natural

06:31 → 06:34

that people like me are officially described

06:34 → 06:36

as mysterious and puzzling

06:36 → 06:38

rather than anyone admitting

06:38 → 06:40

that it is themselves who are confused

06:40 → 06:44

not autistic people or other cognitively disabled people

06:44 → 06:46

who are inherently confusing.

06:47 → 06:49

We are even viewed as non-communicative

06:49 → 06:52

if we don't speak the standard language

06:52 → 06:55

but other people are not considered non-communicative

06:55 → 06:58

if they are so oblivious to our own languages

06:58 → 07:00

as to believe they don't exist.

07:01 → 07:03

In the end I want you to know

07:03 → 07:05

that this has not been intended

07:05 → 07:07

as a voyeuristic freak show

07:07 → 07:09

where you get to look at the bizarre workings

07:09 → 07:11

of the autistic mind.

07:11 → 07:13

It is meant as a strong statement

07:13 → 07:16

on the existence and value of many different kinds

07:16 → 07:18

of thinking and interaction

07:18 → 07:20

in a world where how close you can appear

07:20 → 07:22

to a specific one of them

07:22 → 07:25

determines whether you are seen as a real person

07:26 → 07:28

or an adult or an intelligent person.

07:29 → 07:31

And in a world in what those determine

07:31 → 07:33

whether you have any rights

07:33 → 07:36

there are people being tortured, people dying

07:36 → 07:38

because they are considered non-persons

07:38 → 07:40

because their kind of thought

07:40 → 07:43

is so unusual as to not be considered

07:43 → 07:44

thought at all.

07:44 → 07:46

Only when the many shapes of personhood

07:46 → 07:47

are recognized

07:47 → 07:50

will justice and human rights be possible.

07:51 → 07:53

In My Language

07:53 → 07:56

Dedicated to Ashley X

07:56 → 07:57

Dedicated to all other people

07:57 → 07:59

who are considered non-persons or non-thinking.

07:59 → 08:01

Dedicated to Bryna Siegel

08:01 → 08:02

Dedicated to all other people

08:02 → 08:04

who wrongly view our actions as purposeless.

08:04 → 08:06

Written and produced by A M Baggs

08:06 → 08:09

Acted and sung by A M Baggs and assorted objects

08:15 → 08:17

Thanks, people whose ideas helped inspire this:

08:18 → 08:20

Charles of "The Misbehaviour of Behaviourists"

08:20 → 08:22

Lucas of "The Misbehaviour of the Behaviourists"

08:23 → 08:25

Donna Williams

08:25 → 08:27

Dave Hingsburger

08:27 → 08:30

Cal Montgomery

08:30 → 08:33

Laura Tisoncik