Humanity has set a drift living within a whirlwind of events elavorating of expirience,... ecstasy and tragedy so vaporeous and intricated that for many there is no distinguinshed pattern nothing to decipher life is a phantom with little meaning or tangible tactile truth. for those of these aparent chaos nothing is clear or certain however all of human history can be represented quite simply as a inspiring movement between oposing ideas and forces towards one of only two possible outcomes Understanding... or... catastrophy This progression of time in the development of human awareness float foward and converge in focus and balance cycles inevitably leading to the archetyple clash of opposite... wich then give birthday to new and great ideas There are those who stuared over this natural cycle of events allowing the course of history to find its own way and eventually its own moments of clarity but this is not the hole history for there are also others who have the knowledge and ability to interfere in the natural progresion of events who constantly manipulate the meeting of opposites lowering men to catastrophy and away from understanding in these series we will explore the elements of these vast and imperative conflict wich at this very moment... is about to englobe... all of mankind Sons of Darkness... Sons of Darkness... Sons of Light... Memory is precious, for man has forgotten himself. His true potential-lost. However, an honorable few still recall the root of history. The tales is not yet told, and the final chapter is yet to close... and now then because we are reproducing this amazing item for the first time in this country it is going cost you one cent Collectivism exploring tomorrow The 21st century begins October 1, 1982 before evolving into the facets of collectivism we must first undestand one of it most essential tense a believe wich excuse and warps the collective philosophy making it a destructive force of unbalance this believes is the almost religious conviction that man are bourn as a blank slate collectives believes that human beings nature is entirely determined by the enviroment into it each is born that he is therefore a product an amalgamation of the surroundings and experiences take these away and he becomes nothing but an empty shell everything that we understand has been put to us in some capacity especially our operation Voice of Peter Joseph creator of the films Zeitgeist and Zeitgeist Addendum every word i´m saying has been put to me every concept has been relay in some capacity to me and through my mental operation wich is a form of conditioning i have arrive to novel conclusion my originality is simply because of the the environmental influences that are completely in utterly condition to me as opposed everyone else everyone is different because it comes from different conditioning ... the most important is to realize why people behave the way they do and I argue that is not genetic it is the terrorism based on conditioning they also believe that morality, spirituality and ideas of right and wrong are products of environment as well good and evil are not tangible realities to them only illusory constructs created by humanity itself to better function as a group for what is evil define it for me what causes evil what causes someone to behave an evil manner well i´m asking you do you believe evil exist absolutely not because based on definition of evil it is basically a religious connotations it can it doesn´t mean anything it´s an empty distinction if i was to redefine evil will be admirable behavior and if i was to define admirable behavior i would say almost conclusively that admirable behavior is cause by the necessities of the environment this ideology was born from the existentialist movement which in term gave rise to more relativism which we will discuss later in this series the problem with the blank slate theory is that is entirely false as has been proven in the fields of linguistics, mathematics and jungian psychology among others disciplines there are a number of reasons to doubt that the human mind is a blank slate and some of them just comes from common sense as many people have told me over the years anyone who had over of one child knows that kids coming to the world with certain temperaments and talents it doen´t all come from the outside anyone who has both a child and a house pet has surely notice that the child exposed to speech for acquired human language where as a the house pet won´t presumably because of some innate difference between them linguistics structural vs generative in 1957 a profesor by the name of Noam Chomsky published a monograph on modern linguistics called Syntactic Structures the piece revolutionizes the manner in which language was studied and brought a resounding challenge to the proponents of the blank slate theory blank slate scholars in the fields of linguistics maintain a structuralist view of language to them language was a purely social phoneme like tool making or table manners language was simply a product of environment just as men is simply a product of environment deeper questions of language and mind including how young children can build up a native language from the wash of the adult talks surrounding them were never considered but mister Chomsky was deeply troubled by this account in the mid 1950 he began wrestling with questions he felt structuralist can not answer if language was simply a learn behavior what gave people the ability to produce and understand an infinite number of sentences including those that have never been learned before how did children acquired language seemingly spontaneously without being overly taught what Chomsky soon discovered was that language was not at all a product of environment and that the structuralist view explain almost nothing about of the origins of ... communications Chomsky turned to what he called a generative view of linguistics finding that the basic route of language are inherited in every human being at birth language mister Chomsky drawn to believe was rooted not in behavior but in biology in an unburned set of principles that speakers unconsciously drawn whenever they produce or understand sentences