Don't want to see Ads? Register for your free dotSUB account here!
President Vaclav Klaus - Climate change & freedom
Duration:
9 minutes and 18 seconds
Country:
Czech Republic
Language:
English
Genre:
Documentary
Producer:
reformy.cz
Director:
reformy.cz
Views:
1,293
(835
embedded)
Posted by:
reformy.cz on Oct 12, 2009
Czech Republic President Vaclav Klaus gave a speech at the Climate Change conference in NY receiving a standing Ovation - here are some highlights
Translate and Transcribe
-
Sign In/Register for dotSUB to translate this video.
Share
- Embed Video
- Embed normal player
- Embed a smaller player
- Advanced Embedding Options
-
Embedding OptionsSize:Language:Embed Code
- Embed transcript
- Embed transcript in:
-
Invite a user to dotSUB
Your invitation to join dotSUB was successfulThere was an error inviting that user to dotSUB
Video Transcription
Show in new window
- www.mustwatch.eu - Climate Change policy. It's not about climatology, it's about Freedom!
- Dr. Vaclav Klaus, President of the Czech Republic
- People can't too blindly believe in the IPCC's conclusions
- despite the fact that from the very begining the IPCC has been a political
- rather than a scientific undertaking.
- A few days ago I've come across a lecture given by a very respected German economist,
- who is in his other writings very critical of the German interventionist economic policies
- and etatist institutions.
- Nevertheless his acceptance of the conventional IPCC wisdom, perhaps unwisdom, is striking.
- His words, I quote:"The scientific evidence is overwhelming, the facts are undeniable,
- the temperature is extremely sensitive to even small variations in greenhouse gas concentration.
- If greenhouse gases were absent from the atmosphere, average temperature of the Earth surface
- would be -6 degrees Celsius.
- If the greenhouse gases are present, average temperature is +15 degrees.
- Therefore the impact of CO2 is enormous.
- It's a very sophisticated leading German economic professor.
- And he was even surprised, that in spite of all the measures taken, emissions have accelerated in recent years.
- This poses a puzzle for economic theory.
- (Haha!)
- He says.
- To make it less of a puzzle, let me make two brief comments.
- (Laughter)
- Is an economist - I have to start by stressing the obvious - carbon dioxide emissions do not fall from heaven.
- Their volume is a function of GDP per capita, which means of the size of the economic activity of the number of people.
- And of the emmissions intensity,
- which is the amount of CO2 emissions per Dollar of GDP.
- If we really want to decrease the emissions, we have to either stop the economic growth,
- and thus block further rise in the standards of living,
- or to stop the population growth, or make miracles to reduce the emissions intensity.
- Nothing else.
- I am afraid there are people who really want to stop the economic growth, the rise in the standard of living,
- though not their own,
- and the ability of man to use the expanding wealth of science and technology for solving the actual
- pressing problems of mankind, especially of the developing countries. This...
- Defending human rights
- The freedom to have children without regulation and control is one of the
- undisputable human rights and we have to say very loudly
- that we do respect it and will do so in the future as well.
- Comparing European Emissions during the Kyoto Protocol period
- The EU less developed countries: Greece, Ireland, Portugal and Spain.
- Their rapid economic growth led to the increase of their CO2 emissions in 15 years by 53%.
- Second group. The European post-communist countries, like the Czech Republic,
- which after the fall of communism - simply heavy industry disappearing
- practicaly over night,
- their GDP drastically declined. And so these countries decreased their CO2 emissions
- in the same period by 32%.
- The slow-growing EU countries increased their CO2 emissons in the same period by 4%.
- And yet there is a dream among European politicians to reduce CO2 emissions
- for the entire EU by 30% in the next 13 years.
- What does it mean? Do they assume that all countries would undergo
- a similar economic shock as was experienced by the central and eastern European countries after
- the fall of communism? Do they assume, that European economically weaker countries
- would stop their catching up process?
- Or do they intend to organise a decrease in the number of people living in Europe?
- Or do they expect a miracle in the development of the emissions:GDP ratio,
- which would require a technological revolution of unheard proportions with the help from
- Brussels' organised scientific and technological revolution?
- You know, you are laughing, but for us, who have lived in a communist era,
- the term scientific and technological revolution has a very special meaning.
- It was the idea of Mr. Leonid Breznev at the beginning of the 1970s, when he and others
- discovered that the catching up process with the developed West is impossible, and instead of
- changing the regime, changing the system, he came with the idea of scientific and technological revolution.
- So for me it has a very special substance, this term.
- What I see in Europe and in the US and other countries as well is that
- powerful combination of irresponsibility, of wishful thinking, of implicit believing in some
- form of Malthusianism, of cynical approach of those, who themselves are sufficiently
- well off, together with the strong belief in the possibility of changing the economic
- nature of things through a radical political project.
- This brings me to politics. As a politician, who personally experienced communist central planning of
- all kinds of human activities, I feel obliged to bring back the already almost forgotten
- arguments used in the famous plan versus market debate in the 1930s in economic theory.
- The climate alarmist belief in their own omnipotency. They believe in knowing better
- than millions of rationally behaving men and women, what is right or wrong.
- They believe in their own ability to assembly all relevant data into their central
- climate change regulatory office, equipped with huge super-computers.
- And they believe in the possibility to give adequate instructions to hundreds of millions
- of individuals and institutions and they believe in the non-existence of an incentive problem
- and the resulting compliance or non-compliance of those, who are supposed to follow these instructions.
- I am afraid we have to restart the dicussion of the very nature of government and about
- the relationship between the individual and society.
- Now it concerns the whole mankind, not just the citizens of one particular country.
- To discuss this means to look at the only cannonically structured theoretical
- discussion about socialism or communism and to learn the uncompromising lesson
- from the inevitable collapse of communism 18 years ago.
- To sum up, it is not about climatology, it's about freedom.
- This should be the main message of our conference. Thank You very much.
- Recorded at the international conference on climate change New York March 2008
- transcribed at www.mustwatch.eu


Report this video as offensive